Financial and legal support in case of missed rent payments, lease break, property damage.
Here’s how we’ve helped our housing providers take the risk out of renting.
Simplify property management and protect your rental income—all in one platform.
Increase your applicant pool and fill vacancies faster.
Get credit and financial data from both credit bureaus to see the full picture
Easy, mobile friendly, and comprehensive online rental application form
We will contact your tenant’s references and share a recording and summary of the call
Search eviction court records from Openroom, CanLII, and SOQUIJ
AI-powered scan of income documents to detect signs of tampering or fraud
Confirm a tenant’s identity with AI-powered ID verification and liveness check
Free Lease Agreement Forms for each province in one place
Conversations on real estate trends and property management strategies
Local tools and resources to help you manage your rental property successfully
Learn how to solve renting challenges from our experts
Articles on how to navigate the in-app SingleKey experience
A look at Canada’s average renter profile, affordability, and risk trends based SingleKey’s Q3 2025 rental applications
Get approved for any lease by showing landlords you’re a risk free tenant
Stand out from other applicants with the background check trusted by landlords
Affordable tenant insurance to protect renter's property and liability
Build your credit with every rent payment
Financial and legal support in case of missed rent payments, lease break, property damage.
Here’s how we’ve helped our housing providers take the risk out of renting.
Simplify property management and protect your rental income—all in one platform.
Increase your applicant pool and fill vacancies faster.
Free Lease Agreement Forms for each province in one place
Conversations on real estate trends and property management strategies
Local tools and resources to help you manage your rental property successfully
Learn how to solve renting challenges from our experts
Articles on how to navigate the in-app SingleKey experience
A look at Canada’s average renter profile, affordability, and risk trends based SingleKey’s Q3 2025 rental applications
Get approved for any lease by showing landlords you’re a risk free tenant
Stand out from other applicants with the background check trusted by landlords
Affordable tenant insurance to protect renter's property and liability
Build your credit with every rent payment
We analyzed hundreds of thousands of rental applications and data points across Canada to determine the average renter profile, affordability, and risk signals during Q2 2026.
| Full time | 74.8% |
| Part time | 6.1% |
| Self-employed | 5.0% |
| Student | 4.4% |
| Other | 3.8% |
| Retired/Pension | 3.5% |
| Unemployed | 2.9% |
Canada’s renters have a median age of 33, are mostly full-time employed, and increasingly settled. About 12% have children and 28% have pets, reflecting a demographic renting later into life while starting families.
| Canada | B.C. | Alberta | Prairies | Ontario | Quebec | Maritimes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median age | 33 | 34 | 33 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 33 |
| Average age | 35.9 | 36.7 | 35.7 | 34.2 | 36.2 | 34.8 | 36.2 |
| Average # of occupants | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.1 | 2 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Has children | 12.4% | 14.3% | 13.9% | 12.2% | 12.9% | 6.9% | 16.2% |
| Average # of children | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| Has pets | 27.8% | 35.0% | 33.6% | 30.9% | 26.7% | 16.2% | 32.2% |
| Full-time employment | 74.3% | 73.1% | 73.7% | 74.9% | 74.2% | 76.4% | 74.8% |
| Part-time employment | 6.1% | 5.6% | 6.2% | 5.8% | 6.1% | 6.9% | 4.7% |
| Self-employment | 5.0% | 6.9% | 4.9% | 3.5% | 5.1% | 3.8% | 4.6% |
| Retired | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.1% | 2.0% | 3.9% | 2.7% | 4.6% |
| Unemployed | 2.9% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 1.8% | 2.9% |
| Students | 4.4% | 3.5% | 4.9% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Other | 3.8% | 4.2% | 4.1% | 7.0% | 3.6% | 3.5% | 3.3% |
| GVA | Victoria CMA | Kelowna CMA | Calgary CMA | Edmonton CMA | Winnipeg CMA | GTA | KW / Cambridge | Ottawa - Gatineau | Montreal CMA | Halifax CMA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median age | 34 | 32 | 35 | 33 | 32 | 30.5 | 32 | 32 | 33 | 31 | 32 |
| Average age | 36.3 | 34.5 | 37.4 | 35.8 | 35.7 | 34.9 | 35.7 | 35.4 | 36.4 | 34.3 | 35.5 |
| Average # of occupants | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.1 | 2 | 2.1 | 2 | 1.7 | 2.2 |
| Has children | 13.2% | 9.1% | 14.7% | 13.7% | 13.5% | 16.4% | 11.0% | 15.4% | 11.7% | 6.2% | 15.0% |
| Average # of children | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| Has pets | 27.9% | 38.1% | 38.9% | 31.0% | 34.7% | 36.2% | 15.5% | 36.2% | 23.0% | 14.8% | 31.5% |
| Full-time employment | 78.3% | 77.8% | 67.5% | 76.4% | 71.6% | 69.1% | 78.2% | 77.0% | 73.4% | 76.6% | 76.3% |
| Part-time employment | 4.7% | 3.4% | 6.7% | 5.8% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 4.6% | 5.2% | 6.3% | 7.0% | 4.5% |
| Self-employment | 6.8% | 6.2% | 7.8% | 5.5% | 4.8% | 3.9% | 6.6% | 4.6% | 3.7% | 3.9% | 4.4% |
| Retired | 2.1% | 1.1% | 5.3% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 3.9% | 2.4% | 3.0% | 4.5% | 2.4% | 3.6% |
| Unemployed | 2.6% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 2.3% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 1.9% | 3.4% |
| Students | 2.8% | 4.5% | 4.0% | 3.5% | 7.3% | 3.3% | 3.2% | 5.2% | 6.9% | 5.1% | 5.0% |
| Other | 2.7% | 4.0% | 5.3% | 2.8% | 3.9% | 10.5% | 2.7% | 2.4% | 2.0% | 3.2% | 2.7% |
| Vancouver | Calgary | Winnipeg | Toronto | Montreal | Halifax | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median age | 32 | 33 | 29 | 31.5 | 30 | 30 |
| Average age | 33.6 | 35.7 | 34.1 | 34.7 | 33.3 | 34.2 |
| Average # of occupants | 1.8 | 2 | 2 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.2 |
| Has children | 4.8% | 12.9% | 14.5% | 8.0% | 4.8% | 10.3% |
| Average # of children | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| Has pets | 23.4% | 29.7% | 33.8% | 16.0% | 13.1% | 27.6% |
| Full-time employment | 76.6% | 76.1% | 70.3% | 78.3% | 75.4% | 76.4% |
| Part-time employment | 5.5% | 5.9% | 4.8% | 4.7% | 7.6% | 5.4% |
| Self-employment | 7.9% | 5.6% | 3.4% | 6.0% | 3.9% | 3.7% |
| Retired | 0.7% | 3.1% | 2.8% | 1.9% | 2.0% | 3.4% |
| Unemployed | 2.2% | 2.8% | 4.8% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 2.8% |
| Students | 5.2% | 3.6% | 3.4% | 4.2% | 6.3% | 7.4% |
| Other | 2.0% | 2.9% | 10.3% | 2.7% | 3.1% | 0.9% |
| B.C. | ALBERTA | PRAIRIES | ONTARIO | QUEBEC | MARITIMES | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria | Vancouver | Kelowna | Edmonton | Lethbridge | Red Deer | Fort Mcmurray | Medicine Hat | Regina | Winnipeg | Thunder Bay | Kingston | Barrie | Hamilton | London | Windsor | Greater Sudbury | Gatineau | Laval | Longueuil | Moncton | |
| Median age | 32 | 35 | 33 | 31.5 | 29 | 35 | 33.5 | 29 | 30 | 29 | 28 | 30 | 32.5 | 32 | 30 | 34 | 29 | 34 | 33 | 35 | 35 |
| Average age | 34.7 | 35.9 | 36.5 | 34.9 | 32.2 | 36.6 | 36.9 | 33.9 | 34 | 34.1 | 32.9 | 35.6 | 37.5 | 35.6 | 34.5 | 37 | 33.3 | 37.1 | 37.4 | 36 | 36.3 |
| Average # of occupants | 2 | 2.6 | 2 | 2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2 | 2.1 | 2 | 1.9 | 2 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.3 |
| Has children | 9.3% | 18.6% | 13.3% | 12.7% | 13.4% | 21.9% | 5.3% | 14.5% | 7.9% | 14.5% | 10.9% | 10.0% | 11.7% | 14.3% | 12.4% | 13.7% | 8.9% | 13.1% | 9.4% | 11.7% | 24.0% |
| Average # of children | 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 1.9 |
| Has pets | 39.8% | 47.7% | 35.5% | 32.4% | 34.3% | 42.9% | 18.4% | 44.7% | 29.9% | 33.8% | 35.6% | 32.8% | 33.0% | 30.6% | 37.3% | 26.8% | 23.6% | 19.5% | 15.2% | 12.2% | 24.0% |
| Full-time employment | 77.0% | 68.8% | 66.1% | 71.5% | 67.7% | 78.1% | 88.2% | 58.8% | 78.0% | 70.3% | 79.2% | 65.2% | 75.0% | 73.6% | 64.3% | 72.1% | 76.4% | 76.9% | 83.0% | 81.9% | 72.0% |
| Part-time employment | 3.7% | 8.0% | 7.3% | 5.4% | 7.0% | 7.6% | 2.6% | 13.4% | 7.9% | 4.8% | 6.9% | 8.7% | 4.8% | 7.5% | 9.4% | 7.0% | 4.1% | 6.4% | 4.9% | 7.4% | 6.0% |
| Self-employment | 6.2% | 4.5% | 7.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 1.0% | 2.6% | 3.4% | 0.8% | 3.4% | 1.0% | 2.0% | 6.4% | 4.7% | 3.4% | 4.2% | 2.4% | 3.2% | 4.5% | 2.7% | 5.0% |
| Retired | 1.2% | 3.0% | 4.9% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 4.8% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 2.4% | 2.8% | 1.0% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 3.5% | 3.6% | 4.2% | 2.4% | 4.0% | 3.6% | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Unemployed | 3.1% | 5.0% | 3.9% | 4.0% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 4.8% | 2.0% | 4.0% | 3.7% | 1.9% | 6.0% | 3.1% | 4.9% | 1.6% | 0.9% | 1.6% | 4.0% |
| Students | 5.0% | 5.5% | 4.9% | 8.3% | 8.5% | 3.8% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 3.9% | 3.4% | 5.0% | 10.7% | 0.5% | 4.0% | 7.0% | 4.5% | 8.1% | 3.6% | 1.8% | 2.7% | 8.0% |
| Other | 3.7% | 5.0% | 5.4% | 3.8% | 9.5% | 4.8% | 0.0% | 15.3% | 3.9% | 10.3% | 5.0% | 2.7% | 4.3% | 4.8% | 6.4% | 5.0% | 1.6% | 4.4% | 1.3% | 2.7% | 3.0% |
The average Canadian renter earns a personal income of $72.9k and a household income of $113.9K. Rent alone consumes a little bit over one-quarter (28.1%) of earnings, and if debts are factored in, overall financial strain is increased to one-third (33.8%).
| Canada | B.C. | Alberta | Prairies | Ontario | Quebec | Maritimes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rent price | $2,051 | $2,432 | $1,886 | $1,631 | $2,227 | $1,572 | $1,950 |
| Rent + debt price | $2,681 | $3,143 | $2,580 | $2,178 | $2,846 | $2,097 | $2,598 |
| Household (HH) income | $113,970 | $129,498 | $114,860 | $88,135 | $118,930 | $91,050 | $107,477 |
| HH Rent-to-income | 28.1% | 28.2% | 25.8% | 27.7% | 28.9% | 28.7% | 28.2% |
| Personal (PP) income | $72,950 | $80,728 | $74,816 | $59,513 | $74,539 | $62,856 | $66,179 |
| PP Rent-to-income | 40.8% | 43.8% | 37.3% | 39.7% | 42.9% | 38.6% | 44.0% |
| HH Monthly debt payments | $638 | $724 | $688 | $545 | $632 | $530 | $643 |
| PP Monthly debt payments | $776 | $899 | $835 | $728 | $763 | $675 | $746 |
| HH Rent + debt-to-income | 33.8% | 33.7% | 32.1% | 33.3% | 34.4% | 34.8% | 33.7% |
| PP Rent + debt-to-income | 55.8% | 59.0% | 53.0% | 54.4% | 56.7% | 54.6% | 60.5% |
| GVA | Victoria CMA | Kelowna CMA | Calgary CMA | Edmonton CMA | Winnipeg CMA | GTA | KW / Cambridge | Ottawa - Gatineau | Montreal CMA | Halifax CMA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rent price | $2,652 | $2,440 | $2,259 | $2,012 | $1,808 | $1,585 | $2,550 | $2,150 | $2,236 | $1,567 | $2,180 |
| Rent + debt price | $3,374 | $3,056 | $2,996 | $2,716 | $2,499 | $2,053 | $3,250 | $2,730 | $2,883 | $2,064 | $2,970 |
| Household (HH) income | $138,327 | $169,393 | $121,155 | $120,844 | $113,150 | $79,100 | $138,285 | $110,183 | $115,696 | $91,082 | $121,492 |
| HH Rent-to-income | 27.5% | 27.1% | 28.6% | 25.8% | 25.6% | 29.5% | 28.0% | 28.3% | 29.1% | 28.9% | 29.2% |
| Personal (PP) income | $88,066 | $89,388 | $75,795 | $80,359 | $71,960 | $55,500 | $86,598 | $66,627 | $73,630 | $63,108 | $73,687 |
| PP Rent-to-income | 45.0% | 40.6% | 43.3% | 37.9% | 36.9% | 35.9% | 45.0% | 40.6% | 41.1% | 38.9% | 48.7% |
| HH Monthly debt payments | $740 | $596 | $750 | $689 | $695 | $469 | $722 | $602 | $644 | $503 | $785 |
| PP Monthly debt payments | $904 | $423 | $991 | $822 | $832 | $699 | $860 | $720 | $847 | $644 | $847 |
| HH Rent + debt-to-income | 32.7% | 31.1% | 34.5% | 31.9% | 32.1% | 35.0% | 33.0% | 33.5% | 35.1% | 34.6% | 34.4% |
| PP Rent + debt-to-income | 59.1% | 50.1% | 61.0% | 52.4% | 53.7% | 48.0% | 58.9% | 53.9% | 57.8% | 54.3% | 67.3% |
| Vancouver | Calgary | Winnipeg | Toronto | Montreal | Halifax | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rent price | $2,833 | $1,997 | $1,572 | $2,623 | $1,545 | $2,206 |
| Rent + debt price | $3,377 | $2,689 | $2,032 | $3,286 | $2,005 | $3,045 |
| Household (HH) income | $154,162 | $120,566 | $78,607 | $149,607 | $89,349 | $117,926 |
| HH Rent-to-income | 27.7% | 25.8% | 29.5% | 27.4% | 29.2% | 30.0% |
| Personal (PP) income | $94,502 | $80,664 | $55,427 | $93,279 | $62,589 | $69,369 |
| PP Rent-to-income | 44.1% | 37.8% | 35.6% | 43.8% | 38.3% | 49.0% |
| HH Monthly debt payments | $618 | $676 | $462 | $655 | $459 | $831 |
| PP Monthly debt payments | $772 | $806 | $716 | $775 | $616 | $860 |
| HH Rent + debt-to-income | 31.1% | 31.8% | 34.8% | 31.6% | 34.6% | 34.6% |
| PP Rent + debt-to-income | 53.9% | 52.1% | 48.1% | 56.1% | 52.7% | 64.4% |
| B.C. | ALBERTA | PRAIRIES | ONTARIO | QUEBEC | MARITIMES | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria | Nanaimo | Kelowna | Edmonton | Lethbridge | Red Deer | Fort Mcmurray | Medicine Hat | Regina | Winnipeg | Thunder Bay | Kingston | Barrie | Hamilton | London | Windsor | Greater Sudbury | Gatineau | Laval | Longueuil | Moncton | |
| Rent price | $2,466 | $2,304 | $2,247 | $1,795 | $1,826 | $1,756 | $1,711 | $1,442 | $1,670 | $1,572 | $2,111 | $1,966 | $2,041 | $1,964 | $1,815 | $1,797 | $1,780 | $1,812 | $1,519 | $1,482 | $1,733 |
| Rent + debt price | $3,102 | $2,839 | $2,941 | $2,429 | $2,212 | $2,328 | $3,077 | $1,876 | $2,253 | $2,032 | $2,627 | $2,432 | $2,600 | $2,480 | $2,298 | $2,335 | $2,232 | $2,505 | $2,063 | $2,063 | $2,177 |
| Household (HH) income | $177,031 | $108,105 | $119,027 | $112,565 | $97,272 | $108,851 | $131,676 | $76,655 | $92,003 | $78,607 | $115,851 | $103,670 | $94,935 | $114,251 | $98,444 | $100,174 | $84,391 | $94,021 | $87,312 | $81,252 | $97,682 |
| HH Rent-to-income | 26.4% | 29.3% | 29.2% | 25.6% | 27.9% | 24.9% | 20.5% | 30.1% | 26.5% | 29.5% | 30.7% | 29.4% | 31.5% | 27.9% | 30.0% | 28.2% | 29.9% | 28.9% | 28.2% | 28.4% | 25.3% |
| Personal (PP) income | $92,591 | $61,181 | $72,470 | $72,031 | $56,845 | $72,165 | $87,623 | $46,488 | $60,808 | $55,427 | $63,399 | $63,244 | $61,538 | $70,485 | $54,546 | $63,569 | $56,493 | $64,187 | $57,030 | $57,248 | $59,236 |
| PP Rent-to-income | 40.6% | 41.5% | 42.7% | 36.7% | 38.5% | 37.7% | 33.4% | 39.9% | 38.5% | 35.6% | 45.4% | 40.3% | 44.9% | 41.6% | 34.8% | 38.8% | 37.8% | 40.5% | 41.9% | 41.0% | 39.6% |
| HH Monthly debt payments | $613 | $530 | $692 | $637 | $398 | $585 | $1,337 | $436 | $570 | $462 | $507 | $463 | $538 | $499 | $503 | $534 | $457 | $694 | $559 | $579 | $420 |
| PP Monthly debt payments | $448 | $688 | $963 | $776 | $727 | $996 | $1,210 | $471 | $808 | $716 | $650 | $625 | $615 | $558 | $733 | $643 | $541 | $910 | $723 | $589 | $572 |
| HH Rent + debt-to-income | 30.7% | 34.4% | 34.6% | 31.9% | 32.2% | 31.6% | 28.0% | 36.4% | 31.9% | 34.8% | 34.3% | 34.4% | 37.3% | 32.8% | 35.5% | 34.3% | 35.5% | 37.3% | 34.9% | 35.4% | 30.2% |
| PP Rent + debt-to-income | 50.7% | 53.0% | 59.6% | 51.3% | 52.0% | 53.7% | 58.0% | 51.1% | 55.8% | 48.1% | 56.3% | 52.6% | 58.9% | 53.2% | 50.2% | 51.1% | 49.2% | 61.4% | 62.8% | 57.2% | 52.1% |
| Montreal | Calgary | Toronto | Edmonton | Ottawa | Hamilton | Kelowna | London | Vancouver | Mississauga | Windsor | Halifax | Kingston | Brampton | Kitchener | Medicine Hat | Gatineau | Oshawa | Laval | Lethbridge | Nanaimo | Surrey | Brantford | Longueuil | Barrie | St. Catharines | West Kelowna | Niagara Falls | Etobicoke | Victoria | Belleville | Winnipeg | Vaughan | Welland | Sault Ste. Marie | Markham | Regina | Oakville | Dartmouth | Greater Sudbury | Burlington | Cornwall | North York | Burnaby | Leduc | Red Deer | Thunder Bay | Riverview | Moncton | Cambridge | Coquitlam | Spruce Grove | Brossard | Penticton | Peterborough | Waterloo | Quinte West | Richmond | Guelph | Fort Mcmurray | Sarnia | Dieppe | Pickering | Richmond Hill | Airdrie | Maple Ridge | St. Albert | Beaumont | Bedford | Milton | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rent price | $1,545 | $1,997 | $2,623 | $1,795 | $2,304 | $1,964 | $2,247 | $1,815 | $2,833 | $2,453 | $1,797 | $2,206 | $1,966 | $2,417 | $2,148 | $1,442 | $1,812 | $2,136 | $1,519 | $1,826 | $2,304 | $2,259 | $1,990 | $1,482 | $2,041 | $1,973 | $2,420 | $1,784 | $2,290 | $2,466 | $2,099 | $1,572 | $2,474 | $1,749 | $1,473 | $2,568 | $1,670 | $2,970 | $1,891 | $1,780 | $2,487 | $1,757 | $2,598 | $2,483 | $1,602 | $1,756 | $2,111 | $1,434 | $1,733 | $2,078 | $2,594 | $1,902 | $1,817 | $2,113 | $1,904 | $2,248 | $1,951 | $2,731 | $2,264 | $1,711 | $1,768 | $1,655 | $2,513 | $2,927 | $2,211 | $2,595 | $2,216 | $1,533 | $2,649 | $2,516 |
| Rent + debt price | $2,005 | $2,689 | $3,286 | $2,429 | $2,944 | $2,480 | $2,941 | $2,298 | $3,377 | $3,081 | $2,335 | $3,045 | $2,432 | $3,020 | $2,725 | $1,876 | $2,505 | $2,811 | $2,063 | $2,212 | $2,839 | $3,188 | $2,535 | $2,063 | $2,600 | $2,591 | $3,392 | $2,167 | $2,697 | $3,102 | $2,859 | $2,032 | $3,061 | $2,104 | $1,785 | $3,312 | $2,253 | $4,134 | $2,462 | $2,232 | $3,751 | $2,282 | $3,447 | $3,206 | $2,774 | $2,328 | $2,627 | $1,855 | $2,177 | $2,776 | $3,311 | $2,824 | $2,437 | $2,926 | $2,652 | $2,736 | $2,485 | $3,437 | $3,297 | $3,077 | $2,209 | $2,106 | $3,527 | $4,154 | $3,229 | $3,523 | $3,081 | $2,175 | $3,610 | $3,018 |
| Household (HH) income | $89,349 | $120,566 | $149,607 | $112,565 | $119,322 | $114,251 | $119,027 | $98,444 | $154,162 | $132,667 | $100,174 | $117,926 | $103,670 | $112,709 | $112,365 | $76,655 | $94,021 | $98,705 | $87,312 | $97,272 | $108,105 | $118,786 | $95,906 | $81,252 | $94,935 | $100,864 | $131,047 | $88,638 | $115,407 | $177,031 | $110,860 | $78,607 | $125,289 | $78,481 | $133,492 | $134,655 | $92,003 | $160,898 | $98,341 | $84,391 | $136,881 | $91,548 | $139,795 | $118,851 | $96,344 | $108,851 | $115,851 | $82,429 | $97,682 | $104,984 | $131,859 | $99,549 | $131,615 | $122,990 | $93,112 | $114,359 | $91,240 | $155,171 | $109,576 | $131,676 | $82,929 | $97,722 | $131,984 | $147,875 | $122,735 | $156,932 | $146,633 | $92,281 | $139,635 | $127,179 |
| HH Rent-to-income | 29.2% | 25.8% | 27.4% | 25.6% | 28.9% | 27.9% | 29.2% | 30.0% | 27.7% | 26.3% | 28.2% | 30.0% | 29.4% | 29.1% | 27.8% | 30.1% | 28.9% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 27.9% | 29.3% | 26.6% | 29.4% | 28.4% | 31.5% | 28.7% | 26.9% | 31.5% | 29.3% | 26.4% | 29.1% | 29.5% | 31.0% | 31.0% | 35.2% | 27.8% | 26.5% | 27.6% | 27.6% | 29.9% | 27.1% | 29.3% | 27.9% | 25.9% | 26.1% | 24.9% | 30.7% | 25.5% | 25.3% | 29.8% | 27.2% | 25.2% | 24.8% | 28.1% | 30.5% | 27.8% | 31.1% | 26.9% | 29.7% | 20.5% | 34.0% | 27.1% | 27.0% | 27.0% | 28.1% | 23.1% | 28.8% | 25.2% | 28.3% | 30.2% |
| Personal (PP) income | $62,589 | $80,664 | $93,279 | $72,031 | $75,607 | $70,485 | $72,470 | $54,546 | $94,502 | $82,922 | $63,569 | $69,369 | $63,244 | $66,388 | $67,659 | $46,488 | $64,187 | $65,019 | $57,030 | $56,845 | $61,181 | $75,385 | $58,090 | $57,248 | $61,538 | $65,430 | $85,111 | $51,713 | $74,203 | $92,591 | $56,085 | $55,427 | $73,936 | $49,768 | $110,815 | $87,079 | $60,808 | $102,685 | $57,559 | $56,493 | $89,064 | $58,379 | $90,094 | $88,118 | $62,496 | $72,165 | $63,399 | $55,028 | $59,236 | $68,013 | $76,643 | $70,003 | $71,116 | $88,289 | $59,977 | $63,394 | $55,023 | $89,878 | $69,521 | $87,623 | $45,636 | $57,553 | $90,807 | $75,362 | $69,551 | $91,460 | $71,593 | $58,137 | $85,794 | $75,808 |
| PP Rent-to-income | 38.3% | 37.8% | 43.8% | 36.7% | 40.7% | 41.6% | 42.7% | 34.8% | 44.1% | 44.7% | 38.8% | 49.0% | 40.3% | 58.3% | 39.8% | 39.9% | 40.5% | 38.7% | 41.9% | 38.5% | 41.5% | 43.6% | 39.6% | 41.0% | 44.9% | 40.6% | 46.3% | 38.8% | 47.5% | 40.6% | 51.4% | 35.6% | 47.9% | 41.5% | 38.0% | 46.0% | 38.5% | 47.0% | 46.2% | 37.8% | 41.6% | 39.9% | 46.5% | 36.7% | 33.0% | 37.7% | 45.4% | 39.0% | 39.6% | 45.0% | 50.3% | 38.9% | 37.5% | 42.7% | 42.9% | 35.7% | 41.5% | 50.7% | 49.8% | 33.4% | 45.7% | 39.4% | 34.9% | 55.8% | 42.1% | 45.2% | 47.5% | 34.9% | 51.6% | 60.2% |
| HH Monthly debt payments | $459 | $676 | $655 | $637 | $637 | $499 | $692 | $503 | $618 | $635 | $534 | $831 | $463 | $666 | $583 | $436 | $694 | $666 | $559 | $398 | $530 | $886 | $559 | $579 | $538 | $607 | $1,006 | $374 | $403 | $613 | $731 | $462 | $619 | $363 | $313 | $729 | $570 | $1,231 | $583 | $457 | $1,179 | $533 | $803 | $731 | $1,122 | $585 | $507 | $417 | $420 | $786 | $837 | $868 | $660 | $813 | $740 | $454 | $531 | $699 | $980 | $1,337 | $450 | $471 | $987 | $1,102 | $992 | $909 | $865 | $627 | $948 | $497 |
| PP Monthly debt payments | $616 | $806 | $775 | $776 | $854 | $558 | $963 | $733 | $772 | $706 | $643 | $860 | $625 | $886 | $761 | $471 | $910 | $675 | $723 | $727 | $688 | $1,034 | $710 | $589 | $615 | $567 | $1,100 | $439 | $544 | $448 | $591 | $716 | $919 | $525 | $345 | $830 | $808 | $2,109 | $822 | $541 | $1,771 | $405 | $1,378 | $1,411 | $1,997 | $996 | $650 | $416 | $572 | $913 | $808 | $898 | $958 | $1,084 | $698 | $328 | $794 | $826 | $533 | $1,210 | $805 | $514 | $1,378 | $1,102 | $648 | $1,265 | $933 | $730 | $586 | $322 |
| HH Rent + debt-to-income | 34.6% | 31.8% | 31.6% | 31.9% | 34.4% | 32.8% | 34.6% | 35.5% | 31.1% | 31.4% | 34.3% | 34.6% | 34.4% | 35.4% | 33.6% | 36.4% | 37.3% | 37.4% | 34.9% | 32.2% | 34.4% | 33.9% | 36.1% | 35.4% | 37.3% | 35.5% | 34.0% | 36.3% | 33.1% | 30.7% | 37.3% | 34.8% | 34.8% | 35.3% | 38.3% | 34.1% | 31.9% | 34.7% | 32.7% | 35.5% | 35.9% | 37.6% | 32.6% | 31.5% | 33.4% | 31.6% | 34.3% | 31.7% | 30.2% | 35.6% | 34.5% | 34.6% | 30.9% | 35.6% | 35.9% | 30.3% | 36.0% | 32.6% | 38.1% | 28.0% | 39.7% | 32.2% | 34.0% | 32.0% | 35.5% | 30.1% | 33.4% | 33.6% | 36.1% | 35.7% |
| PP Rent + debt-to-income | 52.7% | 52.1% | 56.1% | 51.3% | 57.1% | 53.2% | 59.6% | 50.2% | 53.9% | 54.3% | 51.1% | 64.4% | 52.6% | 74.3% | 55.8% | 51.1% | 61.4% | 53.5% | 62.8% | 52.0% | 53.0% | 62.3% | 53.3% | 57.2% | 58.9% | 50.7% | 68.0% | 48.2% | 58.1% | 50.7% | 64.7% | 48.1% | 66.2% | 52.0% | 44.9% | 57.5% | 55.8% | 68.3% | 67.8% | 49.2% | 69.6% | 48.9% | 71.6% | 53.6% | 91.1% | 53.7% | 56.3% | 50.4% | 52.1% | 59.6% | 55.4% | 57.7% | 51.8% | 61.1% | 53.3% | 41.3% | 57.0% | 68.0% | 58.1% | 58.0% | 61.0% | 49.0% | 50.4% | 67.8% | 63.1% | 60.6% | 65.0% | 48.6% | 73.0% | 68.8% |
*Household incomes are gross household incomes. Personal incomes are measured as single household applicants only (applicants with a co-signer are excluded, since their rent is financially backed by someone else). Excludes personal below full time provincial minimum wage. After tax = net of federal and provincial income tax, CPP/QPP and EI/QPIP (2026 rates).
Rent is more affordable in central Canada, however these renters have higher collection rates, bankruptcies, and lower credit scores, indicating higher financial instability.
| Canada | B.C. | Alberta | Prairies | Ontario | Quebec | Maritimes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit score | 701 | 701 | 696 | 680 | 708 | 689 | 699 |
| HH Rent-to-income | 28.1% | 28.2% | 25.8% | 27.7% | 28.9% | 28.7% | 28.2% |
| HH Debt-to-income | 6.6% | 6.6% | 7.2% | 6.8% | 6.3% | 6.8% | 6.1% |
| Bankruptcies | 3.2% | 3.1% | 3.7% | 2.6% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 3.6% |
| Collections | 12.9% | 13.2% | 16.4% | 20.8% | 12.2% | 10.2% | 10.1% |
| Application declined | 15.5% | 26.2% | 13.9% | 16.3% | 15.4% | 16.1% | 6.4% |
| GVA | Victoria CMA | Kelowna CMA | Calgary CMA | Edmonton CMA | Winnipeg CMA | GTA | KW / Cambridge | Ottawa - Gatineau | Montreal CMA | Halifax CMA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit score | 715 | 697 | 693 | 711 | 687 | 676 | 733 | 697 | 722 | 689 | 708 |
| HH Rent-to-income | 27.5% | 27.1% | 28.6% | 25.8% | 25.6% | 29.5% | 28.0% | 28.3% | 29.1% | 28.9% | 29.2% |
| HH Debt-to-income | 6.1% | 4.9% | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.2% | 6.5% | 6.0% | 6.7% | 6.5% | 6.4% | 6.1% |
| Bankruptcies | 2.0% | 4.6% | 4.0% | 2.7% | 4.0% | 2.7% | 1.9% | 1.8% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Collections | 9.7% | 14.9% | 15.7% | 12.5% | 18.9% | 21.3% | 6.6% | 12.9% | 8.0% | 9.9% | 11.0% |
| Application declined | 11.7% | 24.1% | 34.3% | 12.7% | 12.6% | 26.2% | 10.1% | 20.8% | 11.4% | 15.2% | 6.2% |
| Vancouver | Calgary | Winnipeg | Toronto | Montreal | Halifax | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit score | 740 | 714 | 674 | 742 | 691 | 719 |
| HH Rent-to-income | 27.7% | 25.8% | 29.5% | 27.4% | 29.2% | 30.0% |
| HH Debt-to-income | 4.3% | 7.1% | 6.4% | 4.9% | 5.8% | 5.2% |
| Bankruptcies | 0.7% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 1.0% | 1.8% | 1.4% |
| Collections | 5.7% | 11.8% | 21.7% | 5.0% | 9.1% | 7.7% |
| Application declined | 6.2% | 12.2% | 27.0% | 8.9% | 15.3% | 3.3% |
| B.C. | ALBERTA | PRAIRIES | ONTARIO | QUEBEC | MARITIMES | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria | Nanaimo | Kelowna | Edmonton | Lethbridge | Red Deer | Fort Mcmurray | Medicine Hat | Regina | Winnipeg | Thunder Bay | Kingston | Barrie | Hamilton | London | Windsor | Greater Sudbury | Gatineau | Laval | Longueuil | Moncton | |
| Credit score | 693 | 694 | 693 | 692 | 681 | 680 | 664 | 656 | 684 | 674 | 709 | 701 | 695 | 694 | 674 | 703 | 693 | 684 | 680 | 680 | 681 |
| HH Rent-to-income | 26.4% | 29.3% | 29.2% | 25.6% | 27.9% | 24.9% | 20.5% | 30.1% | 26.5% | 29.5% | 30.7% | 29.4% | 31.5% | 27.9% | 30.0% | 28.2% | 29.9% | 28.9% | 28.2% | 28.4% | 25.3% |
| HH Debt-to-income | 4.7% | 5.6% | 6.7% | 6.9% | 4.7% | 7.2% | 9.4% | 6.6% | 7.5% | 6.4% | 4.8% | 5.0% | 8.5% | 5.3% | 5.9% | 6.4% | 5.6% | 8.8% | 7.7% | 7.2% | 4.8% |
| Bankruptcies | 4.4% | 4.0% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 6.7% | 7.9% | 6.1% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 3.0% | 5.4% | 5.9% | 2.3% | 4.8% | 2.3% | 0.8% | 6.4% | 5.4% | 2.7% | 4.1% |
| Collections | 16.2% | 14.1% | 14.5% | 18.2% | 17.6% | 20.2% | 11.8% | 24.1% | 22.0% | 21.7% | 10.9% | 15.1% | 13.4% | 15.3% | 20.0% | 14.4% | 13.1% | 12.8% | 12.6% | 8.0% | 10.2% |
| Application declined | 25.9% | 16.7% | 36.4% | 12.7% | 16.7% | 30.0% | 4.2% | 23.5% | 5.6% | 27.0% | 11.4% | 16.4% | 4.2% | 35.5% | 38.5% | 16.2% | 9.3% | 27.5% | 21.9% | 17.5% | 7.5% |
| Montreal | Calgary | Toronto | Edmonton | Ottawa | Hamilton | Kelowna | London | Vancouver | Mississauga | Windsor | Halifax | Kingston | Brampton | Kitchener | Medicine Hat | Gatineau | Oshawa | Laval | Lethbridge | Nanaimo | Surrey | Brantford | Longueuil | Barrie | St. Catharines | West Kelowna | Niagara Falls | Etobicoke | Victoria | Belleville | Winnipeg | Vaughan | Welland | Sault Ste. Marie | Markham | Regina | Oakville | Dartmouth | Greater Sudbury | Burlington | Cornwall | North York | Burnaby | Leduc | Red Deer | Thunder Bay | Riverview | Moncton | Cambridge | Coquitlam | Spruce Grove | Brossard | Penticton | Peterborough | Waterloo | Quinte West | Richmond | Guelph | Fort Mcmurray | Sarnia | Dieppe | Pickering | Richmond Hill | Airdrie | Maple Ridge | St. Albert | Beaumont | Bedford | Milton | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit score | 691 | 714 | 742 | 692 | 730 | 694 | 693 | 674 | 740 | 723 | 703 | 719 | 701 | 714 | 701 | 656 | 684 | 683 | 680 | 681 | 694 | 679 | 657 | 680 | 695 | 695 | 680 | 655 | 730 | 693 | 686 | 674 | 727 | 642 | 613 | 746 | 684 | 748 | 690 | 693 | 726 | 673 | 747 | 724 | 645 | 680 | 709 | 713 | 681 | 661 | 705 | 658 | 689 | 698 | 691 | 724 | 642 | 742 | 729 | 664 | 636 | 708 | 715 | 746 | 643 | 721 | 694 | 644 | 701 | 712 |
| HH Rent-to-income | 29.2% | 25.8% | 27.4% | 25.6% | 28.9% | 27.9% | 29.2% | 30.0% | 27.7% | 26.3% | 28.2% | 30.0% | 29.4% | 29.1% | 27.8% | 30.1% | 28.9% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 27.9% | 29.3% | 26.6% | 29.4% | 28.4% | 31.5% | 28.7% | 26.9% | 31.5% | 29.3% | 26.4% | 29.1% | 29.5% | 31.0% | 31.0% | 35.2% | 27.8% | 26.5% | 27.6% | 27.6% | 29.9% | 27.1% | 29.3% | 27.9% | 25.9% | 26.1% | 24.9% | 30.7% | 25.5% | 25.3% | 29.8% | 27.2% | 25.2% | 24.8% | 28.1% | 30.5% | 27.8% | 31.1% | 26.9% | 29.7% | 20.5% | 34.0% | 27.1% | 27.0% | 27.0% | 28.1% | 23.1% | 28.8% | 25.2% | 28.3% | 30.2% |
| HH Debt-to-income | 5.8% | 7.1% | 4.9% | 6.9% | 6.1% | 5.3% | 6.7% | 5.9% | 4.3% | 5.8% | 6.4% | 5.2% | 5.0% | 7.9% | 7.0% | 6.6% | 8.8% | 8.3% | 7.7% | 4.7% | 5.6% | 7.1% | 7.6% | 7.2% | 8.5% | 6.8% | 9.8% | 6.1% | 4.5% | 4.7% | 7.8% | 6.4% | 6.1% | 5.9% | 4.4% | 8.0% | 7.5% | 8.1% | 5.1% | 5.6% | 10.0% | 8.3% | 6.2% | 6.5% | 8.2% | 7.2% | 4.8% | 6.1% | 4.8% | 8.3% | 8.1% | 9.3% | 7.4% | 7.4% | 9.0% | 3.6% | 7.7% | 7.1% | 8.3% | 9.4% | 5.9% | 5.3% | 6.7% | 10.0% | 9.9% | 6.7% | 7.9% | 8.2% | 9.2% | 5.4% |
| Bankruptcies | 1.8% | 2.4% | 1.0% | 3.5% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 3.5% | 4.8% | 0.7% | 2.6% | 2.3% | 1.4% | 5.4% | 2.3% | 1.1% | 6.1% | 6.4% | 6.9% | 5.4% | 3.5% | 4.0% | 2.0% | 7.3% | 2.7% | 5.9% | 4.9% | 5.5% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 4.4% | 1.3% | 2.1% | 0.7% | 11.8% | 3.8% | 0.0% | 2.4% | 0.8% | 5.6% | 0.8% | 4.3% | 3.4% | 2.0% | 0.9% | 1.9% | 6.7% | 3.0% | 4.0% | 4.1% | 3.1% | 0.0% | 7.4% | 1.1% | 4.5% | 4.9% | 2.5% | 11.5% | 0.0% | 2.6% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 1.3% | 6.9% | 0.0% | 7.5% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 11.9% | 4.5% | 0.0% |
| Collections | 9.1% | 11.8% | 5.0% | 18.2% | 6.7% | 15.3% | 14.5% | 20.0% | 5.7% | 7.3% | 14.4% | 7.7% | 15.1% | 10.6% | 12.8% | 24.1% | 12.8% | 19.3% | 12.6% | 17.6% | 14.1% | 14.8% | 26.9% | 8.0% | 13.4% | 15.3% | 20.9% | 24.7% | 4.5% | 16.2% | 17.0% | 21.7% | 5.0% | 25.7% | 37.9% | 0.8% | 22.0% | 1.6% | 15.1% | 13.1% | 10.3% | 11.0% | 6.1% | 8.2% | 27.4% | 20.2% | 10.9% | 8.9% | 10.2% | 17.5% | 7.1% | 24.2% | 12.0% | 15.7% | 23.5% | 7.4% | 29.5% | 9.0% | 7.8% | 11.8% | 28.9% | 1.3% | 11.1% | 8.6% | 34.3% | 11.9% | 20.6% | 16.4% | 13.6% | 10.6% |
| Application declined | 15.3% | 12.2% | 8.9% | 12.7% | 4.2% | 35.5% | 36.4% | 38.5% | 6.2% | 9.9% | 16.2% | 3.3% | 16.4% | 24.6% | 25.0% | 23.5% | 27.5% | 20.4% | 21.9% | 16.7% | 16.7% | 21.6% | 37.5% | 17.5% | 4.2% | 12.0% | 41.9% | 6.2% | 7.1% | 25.9% | 61.1% | 27.0% | 15.9% | 28.6% | 36.8% | 27.8% | 5.6% | 3.8% | 19.4% | 9.3% | 0.0% | 23.5% | 5.0% | 5.3% | 14.6% | 30.0% | 11.4% | 5.2% | 7.5% | 15.4% | 28.6% | 10.7% | 5.9% | 15.9% | 18.8% | 0.0% | 35.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.2% | 0.0% | 3.3% | 11.1% | 0.0% | 11.1% | 0.0% | 8.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
A common assumption is that smaller cities are more affordable than major metros. Our data shows affordability depends less on rent prices and more on whether local incomes have kept pace. Lower rents don’t automatically translate into lower financial pressure for renters.
That’s why several secondary markets (including Barrie, Thunder Bay, Medicine Hat, London, Halifax, and Greater Sudbury) have some of the highest rent-to-income ratios in the country despite charging less rent than Toronto or Vancouver. Meanwhile, Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Moncton, and Victoria all sit at or below the national average because renter incomes have kept pace more effectively.
This affordability gap is also reshaping how Canadians rent. Cities like Moncton and Calgary support larger renter-family populations while maintaining healthy affordability, whereas Winnipeg shows families often pay a premium to stay there. In markets such as Nanaimo and Halifax, larger households are increasingly driven by unrelated adults sharing housing rather than families, reflecting the growing importance of shared income in maintaining affordability.
Lower rents don’t always mean greater affordability
Only about one-third of cities exceed the 30% rent-to-income threshold, and nearly all are secondary markets. Despite their lower rents, cities like Barrie and Thunder Bay place a greater income burden on renters than Toronto or Vancouver, where incomes have kept pace more effectively.
Shared income is becoming essential to affordability
Household affordability masks the financial pressure facing individual renters. Across every market analyzed, single renters spend at least 42% of their after-tax income on rent, showing that dual-income households, roommates, and shared living arrangements are increasingly supporting rental affordability.
Larger households increasingly reflect affordability, not family growth
Nanaimo and Halifax have the largest average household sizes in their respective groups, despite relatively few households with children. Much of that additional occupancy comes from unrelated adults sharing housing, suggesting larger households increasingly reflect financial necessity rather than family formation.
Renter Affordability Analysis
Comparing rent, household income, remaining income, and rent-to-income ratios across Canada reveals that affordability is driven by earnings rather than housing costs alone. Some of the country’s most expensive rental markets also leave renters with the most disposable income, while several lower-cost markets remain less affordable because local incomes have not kept pace.
How to read this chart: Bars show average monthly household income, broken into rent, debt payments, and remaining income. The black line shows the share of income spent on rent. Together, they illustrate why similar rents can produce very different affordability outcomes.
Personal after tax Affordability analysis
Household income suggests affordability is improving, but personal after-tax income tells a different story. Across every market analyzed, single renters spend at least 42% of their take-home pay on rent, with several cities exceeding 50%. This gap highlights how much modern rental affordability now depends on dual-income households, roommates, or other shared income arrangements rather than individual earnings.
Single household applicants only (applicants with a co-signer are excluded, since their rent is financially backed by someone else). Excludes personal below full time provincial minimum wage. After tax = net of federal and provincial income tax, CPP/QPP and EI/QPIP (2026 rates).
Household composition analysis
Moncton, Red Deer, and Calgary are examples of family markets where incomes have kept pace with housing costs, supporting both affordability and larger renter families. Winnipeg is the exception: it has the country’s largest share of renter families, but those households face significantly higher rent burdens, showing that family presence alone is not a sign of affordability.
How to read this chart: Bars represent the average renter household size, broken into estimated adults and children. The black line indicates the share of renter households with children. Comparing the bars to the line helps distinguish family-driven household growth (larger households with many families) from shared-housing growth (larger households with relatively few families).
Rent vs Income Analysis
Across every province, major city, and secondary market, households spend a much smaller share of their income on rent than individuals. This reflects the financial benefit of multiple income earners sharing housing costs. While household affordability generally falls below the 30% benchmark, individual renters in many markets face significantly higher rent burdens, highlighting the growing importance of shared housing and dual-income households in maintaining affordability.
How to read this chart: Each city shows rent as a share of gross personal income and household income. The gap between the two reflects how renting is more affordable on two incomes instead of one. All income is measured as gross monthly income before taxes.
Cost of Rent Analysis
While Vancouver and Toronto remain Canada’s most expensive rental markets, they are not isolated outliers. Across Canada, rents in major cities closely track provincial averages, suggesting regional housing markets have a greater influence on rental prices than city size alone. Quebec and the Prairies remain the country’s most affordable regions, while B.C. and Ontario continue to command a premium across both metropolitan and secondary markets.
How to read this chart: The first chart compares average monthly rent across provinces alongside their largest and secondary markets. The second compares each province’s average rent to its largest city, showing how closely metropolitan rents align with broader regional pricing.
Renter Income Analysis
Canadian renters are becoming more financially resilient. Gross household income increased 4.6% year over year while rent-to-income improved from 29.4% to 28.1%, driven by both income growth and lower average rents. Credit scores also rose from 697 to 701, suggesting stronger overall creditworthiness.
Despite these improvements, collections activity increased from 10.9% to 12.9%. Nearly half of renters still earn under $60,000, but collections are rising across all income brackets, not just lower-income households. This suggests that unresolved legacy debt, such as unpaid utility bills, telecommunications balances, or other delinquent accounts, continues to affect renters regardless of current earning power.
701
$113,970
12.9%
| Canada | B.C. | Alberta | Prairies | Ontario | Quebec | Maritimes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit Score | 701 | 701 | 696 | 680 | 708 | 689 | 699 |
| Rent price | $2,051 | $2,432 | $1,886 | $1,631 | $2,227 | $1,572 | $1,950 |
| Rent Price YoY Change | -2.1% | -3.8% | -1.3% | -2.0% | +0.5% | -7.0% | +1.5% |
| Rent-to-income | 28.1% | 28.2% | 25.8% | 27.7% | 28.9% | 28.7% | 28.2% |
| Household income | $113,970 | $129,498 | $114,860 | $88,135 | $118,930 | $91,050 | $107,477 |
| Household income YoY Change | +4.6% | +1.2% | +3.5% | -8.6% | +7.9% | +3.8% | +9.7% |
| Personal income | $72,950 | $80,728 | $74,816 | $59,513 | $74,539 | $62,856 | $66,179 |
| Personal income YoY Change | +3.0% | -1.8% | +2.1% | -0.2% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +7.5% |
| Collections | 12.9% | 13.2% | 16.4% | 20.8% | 12.2% | 10.2% | 10.1% |
| Collections YoY Change | +18.4% | +41.5% | +19.8% | +14.0% | +18.0% | +34.0% | -16.4% |
| GVA | Victoria CMA | Kelowna CMA | Calgary CMA | Edmonton CMA | Winnipeg CMA | GTA | KW / Cambridge | Ottawa - Gatineau | Montreal CMA | Halifax CMA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit Score | 715 | 697 | 693 | 711 | 687 | 676 | 733 | 697 | 722 | 689 | 708 |
| Rent price | $2,652 | $2,440 | $2,259 | $2,012 | $1,808 | $1,585 | $2,550 | $2,150 | $2,236 | $1,567 | $2,180 |
| Rent Price YoY Change | -3.0% | +0.1% | -2.5% | -2.4% | -1.4% | -8.3% | -3.5% | +0.4% | +3.6% | -8.1% | -1.1% |
| Rent-to-income | 27.5% | 27.1% | 28.6% | 25.8% | 25.6% | 29.5% | 28.0% | 28.3% | 29.1% | 28.9% | 29.2% |
| Household income | $138,327 | $169,393 | $121,155 | $120,844 | $113,150 | $79,100 | $138,285 | $110,183 | $115,696 | $91,082 | $121,492 |
| Household income YoY Change | +1.0% | +43.7% | -2.2% | +3.9% | +4.0% | -20.8% | +6.2% | +2.9% | +2.1% | +3.9% | +4.6% |
| Personal income | $88,066 | $89,388 | $75,795 | $80,359 | $71,960 | $55,500 | $86,598 | $66,627 | $73,630 | $63,108 | $73,687 |
| Personal income YoY Change | +0.7% | +16.0% | -2.9% | +4.4% | +1.4% | -7.2% | +1.5% | +0.1% | +1.9% | +3.5% | +3.7% |
| Collections | 9.7% | 14.9% | 15.7% | 12.5% | 18.9% | 21.3% | 6.6% | 12.9% | 8.0% | 9.9% | 11.0% |
| Collections YoY Change | +18.5% | +161.9% | +51.4% | +53.5% | -1.6% | +6.7% | +14.9% | +98.2% | +27.8% | +42.5% | -4.9% |
| Vancouver | Calgary | Winnipeg | Toronto | Montreal | Halifax | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit Score | 740 | 714 | 674 | 742 | 691 | 719 |
| Rent price | $2,833 | $1,997 | $1,572 | $2,623 | $1,545 | $2,206 |
| Rent Price YoY Change | -6.0% | -2.8% | -8.9% | -5.0% | -8.8% | +5.5% |
| Rent-to-income | 27.7% | 25.8% | 29.5% | 27.4% | 29.2% | 30.0% |
| Household income | $154,162 | $120,566 | $78,607 | $149,607 | $89,349 | $117,926 |
| Household income YoY Change | +2.5% | +3.2% | -20.5% | +5.1% | +3.2% | +5.1% |
| Personal income | $94,502 | $80,664 | $55,427 | $93,279 | $62,589 | $69,369 |
| Personal income YoY Change | -2.4% | +4.2% | -6.2% | -2.9% | +3.1% | -6.2% |
| Collections | 5.7% | 11.8% | 21.7% | 5.0% | 9.1% | 7.7% |
| Collections YoY Change | +18.3% | +55.5% | +7.3% | +33.5% | +61.7% | -19.6% |
| B.C. | ALBERTA | PRAIRIES | ONTARIO | QUEBEC | MARITIMES | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria | Nanaimo | Kelowna | Edmonton | Lethbridge | Red Deer | Fort Mcmurray | Medicine Hat | Regina | Winnipeg | Thunder Bay | Kingston | Barrie | Hamilton | London | Windsor | Greater Sudbury | Gatineau | Laval | Longueuil | Moncton | |
| Credit Score | 693 | 694 | 693 | 692 | 681 | 680 | 664 | 656 | 684 | 674 | 709 | 701 | 695 | 694 | 674 | 703 | 693 | 684 | 680 | 680 | 681 |
| Rent price | $2,466 | $2,304 | $2,247 | $1,795 | $1,826 | $1,756 | $1,711 | $1,442 | $1,670 | $1,572 | $2,111 | $1,966 | $2,041 | $1,964 | $1,815 | $1,797 | $1,780 | $1,812 | $1,519 | $1,482 | $1,733 |
| Rent Price YoY Change | +3.2% | +6.0% | -2.3% | -1.5% | +8.6% | +2.8% | -1.1% | -1.7% | +7.4% | -8.9% | +7.7% | +6.1% | -3.1% | +0.9% | +4.1% | -8.4% | -5.0% | +8.0% | -10.2% | -10.5% | +7.2% |
| Rent-to-income | 26.4% | 29.3% | 29.2% | 25.6% | 27.9% | 24.9% | 20.5% | 30.1% | 26.5% | 29.5% | 30.7% | 29.4% | 31.5% | 27.9% | 30.0% | 28.2% | 29.9% | 28.9% | 28.2% | 28.4% | 25.3% |
| Household income | $177,031 | $108,105 | $119,027 | $112,565 | $97,272 | $108,851 | $131,676 | $76,655 | $92,003 | $78,607 | $115,851 | $103,670 | $94,935 | $114,251 | $98,444 | $100,174 | $84,391 | $94,021 | $87,312 | $81,252 | $97,682 |
| Household income YoY Change | +56.2% | +22.2% | -6.2% | +4.4% | +22.0% | -1.3% | -2.9% | -6.8% | +1.6% | -20.5% | +6.6% | +25.6% | -6.3% | +16.5% | +3.2% | +5.0% | -21.5% | +10.0% | -6.8% | -1.1% | +25.9% |
| Personal income | $92,591 | $61,181 | $72,470 | $72,031 | $56,845 | $72,165 | $87,623 | $46,488 | $60,808 | $55,427 | $63,399 | $63,244 | $61,538 | $70,485 | $54,546 | $63,569 | $56,493 | $64,187 | $57,030 | $57,248 | $59,236 |
| Personal income YoY Change | +27.1% | +10.8% | -10.5% | +5.0% | +2.3% | -7.3% | -12.6% | -12.7% | +5.9% | -6.2% | +5.0% | +13.4% | -6.8% | +19.7% | -16.2% | -0.6% | -16.2% | +6.6% | -3.8% | -9.9% | +9.9% |
| Collections | 16.2% | 14.1% | 14.5% | 18.2% | 17.6% | 20.2% | 11.8% | 24.1% | 22.0% | 21.7% | 10.9% | 15.1% | 13.4% | 15.3% | 20.0% | 14.4% | 13.1% | 12.8% | 12.6% | 8.0% | 10.2% |
| Collections YoY Change | +171.6% | +6.9% | +56.4% | -4.2% | +36.3% | +125.5% | -16.3% | +46.8% | +15.3% | +7.3% | +150.5% | +5.7% | -34.0% | +26.8% | +18.4% | -3.0% | -6.8% | +36.9% | +1.7% | -0.8% | +97.3% |
| Montreal | Calgary | Toronto | Edmonton | Ottawa | Hamilton | Kelowna | London | Vancouver | Mississauga | Windsor | Halifax | Kingston | Brampton | Kitchener | Medicine Hat | Gatineau | Oshawa | Laval | Lethbridge | Nanaimo | Surrey | Brantford | Longueuil | Barrie | St. Catharines | West Kelowna | Niagara Falls | Etobicoke | Victoria | Belleville | Winnipeg | Vaughan | Welland | Sault Ste. Marie | Markham | Regina | Oakville | Dartmouth | Greater Sudbury | Burlington | Cornwall | North York | Burnaby | Leduc | Red Deer | Thunder Bay | Riverview | Moncton | Cambridge | Coquitlam | Spruce Grove | Brossard | Penticton | Peterborough | Waterloo | Quinte West | Richmond | Guelph | Fort Mcmurray | Sarnia | Dieppe | Pickering | Richmond Hill | Airdrie | Maple Ridge | St. Albert | Beaumont | Bedford | Milton | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit Score | 691 | 714 | 742 | 692 | 730 | 694 | 693 | 674 | 740 | 723 | 703 | 719 | 701 | 714 | 701 | 656 | 684 | 683 | 680 | 681 | 694 | 679 | 657 | 680 | 695 | 695 | 680 | 655 | 730 | 693 | 686 | 674 | 727 | 642 | 613 | 746 | 684 | 748 | 690 | 693 | 726 | 673 | 747 | 724 | 645 | 680 | 709 | 713 | 681 | 661 | 705 | 658 | 689 | 698 | 691 | 724 | 642 | 742 | 729 | 664 | 636 | 708 | 715 | 746 | 643 | 721 | 694 | 644 | 701 | 712 |
| Rent price | $1,545 | $1,997 | $2,623 | $1,795 | $2,304 | $1,964 | $2,247 | $1,815 | $2,833 | $2,453 | $1,797 | $2,206 | $1,966 | $2,417 | $2,148 | $1,442 | $1,812 | $2,136 | $1,519 | $1,826 | $2,304 | $2,259 | $1,990 | $1,482 | $2,041 | $1,973 | $2,420 | $1,784 | $2,290 | $2,466 | $2,099 | $1,572 | $2,474 | $1,749 | $1,473 | $2,568 | $1,670 | $2,970 | $1,891 | $1,780 | $2,487 | $1,757 | $2,598 | $2,483 | $1,602 | $1,756 | $2,111 | $1,434 | $1,733 | $2,078 | $2,594 | $1,902 | $1,817 | $2,113 | $1,904 | $2,248 | $1,951 | $2,731 | $2,264 | $1,711 | $1,768 | $1,655 | $2,513 | $2,927 | $2,211 | $2,595 | $2,216 | $1,533 | $2,649 | $2,516 |
| Rent Price YoY Change | -8.8% | -2.8% | -5.0% | -1.5% | +3.1% | +0.9% | -2.3% | +4.1% | -6.0% | -1.2% | -8.4% | +5.5% | +6.1% | -6.8% | +2.1% | -1.7% | +8.0% | -4.4% | -10.2% | +8.6% | +6.0% | -9.1% | +3.5% | -10.5% | -3.1% | -2.5% | +8.5% | +12.7% | -12.5% | +3.2% | -0.9% | -8.9% | +3.8% | -0.3% | -7.7% | -7.7% | +7.4% | +8.9% | -17.7% | -5.0% | -11.7% | +0.5% | +11.2% | -8.4% | -5.9% | +2.8% | +7.7% | -4.3% | +7.2% | +5.0% | +1.0% | -1.5% | -22.1% | -14.6% | -8.1% | -2.4% | +10.3% | +5.2% | +9.0% | -1.1% | -18.8% | -8.1% | -0.0% | +7.7% | +1.7% | +4.5% | +12.9% | -14.4% | +9.7% | +5.0% |
| Rent-to-income | 29.2% | 25.8% | 27.4% | 25.6% | 28.9% | 27.9% | 29.2% | 30.0% | 27.7% | 26.3% | 28.2% | 30.0% | 29.4% | 29.1% | 27.8% | 30.1% | 28.9% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 27.9% | 29.3% | 26.6% | 29.4% | 28.4% | 31.5% | 28.7% | 26.9% | 31.5% | 29.3% | 26.4% | 29.1% | 29.5% | 31.0% | 31.0% | 35.2% | 27.8% | 26.5% | 27.6% | 27.6% | 29.9% | 27.1% | 29.3% | 27.9% | 25.9% | 26.1% | 24.9% | 30.7% | 25.5% | 25.3% | 29.8% | 27.2% | 25.2% | 24.8% | 28.1% | 30.5% | 27.8% | 31.1% | 26.9% | 29.7% | 20.5% | 34.0% | 27.1% | 27.0% | 27.0% | 28.1% | 23.1% | 28.8% | 25.2% | 28.3% | 30.2% |
| Household income | $89,349 | $120,566 | $149,607 | $112,565 | $119,322 | $114,251 | $119,027 | $98,444 | $154,162 | $132,667 | $100,174 | $117,926 | $103,670 | $112,709 | $112,365 | $76,655 | $94,021 | $98,705 | $87,312 | $97,272 | $108,105 | $118,786 | $95,906 | $81,252 | $94,935 | $100,864 | $131,047 | $88,638 | $115,407 | $177,031 | $110,860 | $78,607 | $125,289 | $78,481 | $133,492 | $134,655 | $92,003 | $160,898 | $98,341 | $84,391 | $136,881 | $91,548 | $139,795 | $118,851 | $96,344 | $108,851 | $115,851 | $82,429 | $97,682 | $104,984 | $131,859 | $99,549 | $131,615 | $122,990 | $93,112 | $114,359 | $91,240 | $155,171 | $109,576 | $131,676 | $82,929 | $97,722 | $131,984 | $147,875 | $122,735 | $156,932 | $146,633 | $92,281 | $139,635 | $127,179 |
| Household income YoY Change | +3.2% | +3.2% | +5.1% | +4.4% | +0.2% | +16.5% | -6.2% | +3.2% | +2.5% | +4.2% | +5.0% | +5.1% | +25.6% | +7.3% | +12.0% | -6.8% | +10.0% | -0.5% | -6.8% | +22.0% | +22.2% | -11.9% | -10.1% | -1.1% | -6.3% | -0.8% | +11.1% | +16.9% | -2.3% | +56.2% | +8.7% | -20.5% | +8.1% | +7.7% | +58.6% | +6.5% | +1.6% | +19.6% | -20.7% | -21.5% | +8.2% | +1.6% | +18.4% | -9.4% | -7.4% | -1.3% | +6.6% | +14.2% | +25.9% | +12.4% | +11.5% | -15.0% | +4.5% | +1.5% | -1.4% | -14.4% | +13.6% | +39.9% | -10.0% | -2.9% | -1.9% | +17.6% | +7.6% | +20.9% | +7.2% | +35.0% | +14.0% | -2.8% | +16.7% | -1.4% |
| Personal income | $62,589 | $80,664 | $93,279 | $72,031 | $75,607 | $70,485 | $72,470 | $54,546 | $94,502 | $82,922 | $63,569 | $69,369 | $63,244 | $66,388 | $67,659 | $46,488 | $64,187 | $65,019 | $57,030 | $56,845 | $61,181 | $75,385 | $58,090 | $57,248 | $61,538 | $65,430 | $85,111 | $51,713 | $74,203 | $92,591 | $56,085 | $55,427 | $73,936 | $49,768 | $110,815 | $87,079 | $60,808 | $102,685 | $57,559 | $56,493 | $89,064 | $58,379 | $90,094 | $88,118 | $62,496 | $72,165 | $63,399 | $55,028 | $59,236 | $68,013 | $76,643 | $70,003 | $71,116 | $88,289 | $59,977 | $63,394 | $55,023 | $89,878 | $69,521 | $87,623 | $45,636 | $57,553 | $90,807 | $75,362 | $69,551 | $91,460 | $71,593 | $58,137 | $85,794 | $75,808 |
| Personal income YoY Change | +3.1% | +4.2% | -2.9% | +5.0% | +0.8% | +19.7% | -10.5% | -16.2% | -2.4% | -0.7% | -0.6% | -6.2% | +13.4% | +13.1% | +11.4% | -12.7% | +6.6% | +10.1% | -3.8% | +2.3% | +10.8% | -11.3% | +1.6% | -9.9% | -6.8% | +9.9% | +23.5% | +20.2% | +5.1% | +27.1% | +12.0% | -6.2% | -0.7% | +5.9% | +132.5% | +10.7% | +5.9% | +15.6% | -12.0% | -16.2% | +5.3% | -12.0% | +21.7% | -0.9% | -13.0% | -7.3% | +5.0% | -6.8% | +9.9% | +5.5% | -4.5% | -16.5% | -0.9% | +25.5% | +2.7% | -22.8% | +1.5% | +21.6% | +1.3% | -12.6% | -27.7% | +7.4% | +5.1% | -6.0% | -2.7% | +24.9% | -23.2% | -15.2% | +14.3% | -5.6% |
| Collections | 9.1% | 11.8% | 5.0% | 18.2% | 6.7% | 15.3% | 14.5% | 20.0% | 5.7% | 7.3% | 14.4% | 7.7% | 15.1% | 10.6% | 12.8% | 24.1% | 12.8% | 19.3% | 12.6% | 17.6% | 14.1% | 14.8% | 26.9% | 8.0% | 13.4% | 15.3% | 20.9% | 24.7% | 4.5% | 16.2% | 17.0% | 21.7% | 5.0% | 25.7% | 37.9% | 0.8% | 22.0% | 1.6% | 15.1% | 13.1% | 10.3% | 11.0% | 6.1% | 8.2% | 27.4% | 20.2% | 10.9% | 8.9% | 10.2% | 17.5% | 7.1% | 24.2% | 12.0% | 15.7% | 23.5% | 7.4% | 29.5% | 9.0% | 7.8% | 11.8% | 28.9% | 1.3% | 11.1% | 8.6% | 34.3% | 11.9% | 20.6% | 16.4% | 13.6% | 10.6% |
| Collections YoY Change | +61.7% | +55.5% | +33.5% | -4.2% | +31.0% | +26.8% | +56.4% | +18.4% | +18.3% | +84.2% | -3.0% | -19.6% | +5.7% | -2.8% | +82.6% | +46.8% | +36.9% | +34.4% | +1.7% | +36.3% | +6.9% | +43.9% | +53.1% | -0.8% | -34.0% | +31.4% | +30.1% | +8.3% | -58.1% | +171.6% | -10.8% | +7.3% | -33.8% | -10.9% | +225.1% | -50.8% | +15.3% | -55.6% | +10.3% | -6.8% | +556.4% | +2.2% | -61.6% | +718.2% | -9.1% | +125.5% | +150.5% | -60.5% | +97.3% | +96.3% | -17.3% | +161.5% | +175.0% | +93.3% | +105.9% | +181.5% | +55.5% | -10.3% | -11.2% | -16.3% | +4.2% | -32.0% | +166.7% | +75.7% | +187.5% | -4.5% | +183.1% | -5.6% | -7.3% | +10.3% |
Canadian renters continue to build stronger credit profiles, with average credit scores improving across nearly every major market. At the same time, collections activity is increasing in many cities, showing that stronger credit scores don’t necessarily translate into lower financial risk. Creditworthiness and collections are becoming increasingly decoupled, making it important to evaluate multiple indicators rather than relying on a single metric.
Employment type also tells a weaker risk story than many assume. Self-employed renters now average a 708 credit score. This is higher than full-time employees (701) and part-time workers (699). The largest differences appear between renters with stable income of any kind and those without, with retirees posting the strongest scores and unemployed renters the weakest.
701
Great: 700-759
Good: 640-699
| Province | Avg credit score |
|---|---|
| B.C | 701 |
| Alberta | 696 |
| Prairies | 680 |
| Ontario | 708 |
| Quebec | 689 |
| Maritimes | 699 |
| Rank | Score range | Segment size |
|---|---|---|
| Low | 360-559 | 11.8% |
| Fair | 560-639 | 12.7% |
| Good | 640-699 | 19.0% |
| Great | 700-759 | 24.5% |
| Excellent | 760+ | 32.0% |
| Major city | Score | Secondary city | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vancouver | 740 | Kelowna | 693 |
| Calgary | 714 | Edmonton | 692 |
| Winnipeg | 674 | Regina | 684 |
| Toronto | 742 | Thunder Bay | 709 |
| Montreal | 691 | Gatineau | 684 |
| Halifax | 719 | Moncton | 681 |
Stronger, more reliable renters nationwide
Canada’s rental market continues to strengthen. National credit scores increased from 697 to 701, while bankruptcies declined from 3.4% to 3.2% year over year. Together, these trends point to improving tenant financial health and a more stable rental environment for landlords.
Self-employment isn't a credit red flag... it's not even second place
Self-employed renters average a 708 credit score—higher than full-time (701) and part-time (699) employees. The real divide isn’t employment type, but income stability: unemployed renters (663) and those outside the workforce (656) score well below every employed group.
Regional risk varies more than city size
Tenant risk differs significantly across regions, regardless of market size. Collections, bankruptcies, and credit scores vary widely between cities, reinforcing the need for market-specific screening policies rather than relying on broad assumptions about major or secondary markets.
Credit scores alone are no longer enough to tell the whole story
National credit scores rose to 701 and bankruptcies fell to 3.2%, yet collections increased from 10.9% to 12.9%. This suggests many renters are carrying unresolved debts despite improving credit profiles, making collections data an important complement to credit scores when assessing tenant risk.
Canadian renters continue to build stronger credit profiles, with average credit scores improving across nearly every major market. At the same time, collections activity is increasing in many cities, showing that stronger credit scores don’t necessarily translate into lower financial risk. Creditworthiness and collections are becoming increasingly decoupled, making it important to evaluate multiple indicators rather than relying on a single metric.
Employment type also tells a weaker risk story than many assume. Self-employed renters now average a 708 credit score. This is higher than full-time employees (701) and part-time workers (699). The largest differences appear between renters with stable income of any kind and those without, with retirees posting the strongest scores and unemployed renters the weakest.
Collections
21.7%
Bankruptcies
2.1%
Credit Score
674
Collections
42.1%
Bankruptcies
6.1%
Credit Score
656
Collections
20.0%
Bankruptcies
4.8%
Credit Score
674
Collections
15.1%
Bankruptcies
5.4%
Credit Score
701
Collections
16.2%
Bankruptcies
4.4%
Credit Score
693
Collections
18.2%
Bankruptcies
3.5%
Credit Score
692
Collections
5.0%
Bankruptcies
1.0%
Credit Score
742
Collections
5.7%
Bankruptcies
0.7%
Credit Score
740
Collections
7.7%
Bankruptcies
1.4%
Credit Score
719
Collections reveal hidden financial stress
While bankruptcies remain relatively low across Canada, collections vary dramatically between markets, suggesting unresolved consumer debt is a more useful leading indicator of tenant payment risk.
Credit scores alone don’t predict payment risk
Markets with similar credit scores often produce very different collections and bankruptcy outcomes, reinforcing the need to evaluate multiple financial indicators when screening tenants.
Tailor screening to the market
Markets with elevated collections or bankruptcy rates may warrant stronger screening standards, larger financial buffers, or additional income verification, while lower-risk markets may allow greater flexibility.
Risk is local, rather than not regional
No province or market type is universally high or low risk. Tenant reliability varies substantially between neighbouring cities, making screening applicants increasingly important. Every applicant must be evaluated on a case by case basis.